Shoddy Reliability of Forensic Evidence II: Systematic bias and judgment errors in forensic mental health evaluations

A new study hot off the press addresses “typical judgment errors” in forensic mental health reports (Iudici, Salvini, Faccio, & Castelnuovo (2015).The Clinical Assessment in the Legal Field: An Empirical Study of Bias and Limitations in Forensic Expertise, Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1831. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01831).

Content analyses of forensic mental health evaluations revealed distortions in the attributions of causality, inferential errors, and epistemological inconsistencies similar to judgment errors made by the “man in the street.”


No Comments

Leave a Reply